An HDL editor, a simulator and a static analysis tool examine the same source code from different perspectives. Start by choosing the task, then compare the features it requires. The product pages below help prepare a concrete evaluation.
| Tool | Focus | First evaluation question |
|---|---|---|
| Sigasi Visual HDL | HDL development in VS Code | Does the project view match our build? |
| Active-HDL | Integrated FPGA development workflow on Windows | Does the environment fit our projects and IP models? |
| Riviera-PRO | Simulation and advanced verification | Are our testbenches and analyses supported? |
| ALINT-PRO | Static design analysis | Which structural risks and rules do we want to check? |
Products in detail
Product / solution
Riviera-PRO: simulation and functional verification
A verification platform for HDL testbenches, debugging and repeatable regressions.
Read articleProduct / solution
Sigasi Visual HDL: development in project context
HDL-specific support in Visual Studio Code for navigation, analysis and a consistent development workflow.
Read articleProduct / solution
Active-HDL: FPGA development and simulation
An integrated Windows environment for FPGA projects, from design entry to simulation and debugging.
Read articleProduct / solution
ALINT-PRO: static analysis of HDL designs
Investigate structural risks and rule violations systematically, with a deliberately chosen analysis scope.
Read articleSelect under realistic conditions
Use a representative part of your project for comparison. Record more than the first successful run: include setup, debugging and handover to a second team member. Editions, language options and licensing models can only be meaningfully assessed once the necessary features are clear.
Describe these requirements in an evaluation licence request or send a defined set of needs for a quotation. Availability and terms are clarified individually.